Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
J Community Health ; 48(3): 489-495, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2227873

ABSTRACT

To assess factors influencing acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine in a population of predominantly indigent, minority, pregnant and non-pregnant people of reproductive age. Cross-sectional survey using a modified Health Belief model administered between January 2021 and January 2022 at four hospitals in Brooklyn. Participants included English-speaking reproductive aged persons attending clinics at the participating sites. Descriptive and univariate data analyses were used for analysis. 283 eligible reproductive persons were approached of whom 272 completed the survey (96%). Three quarters said they would take the vaccine under certain circumstances ("as soon as it is ready" [28.6%], "when my doctor recommends it" [21.3%] or "when enough people have received it to know if it works" [25%]), while 25% said they would never take the vaccine. When comparing persons that would take it under certain circumstances to those that never would, the "never" group was significantly more likely to note that, "they would not trust any COVID vaccine" (71.4% vs. 28.5%; p ≤ 0.0001). This greater level of distrust extended to greater distrust of doctors, government, family, newspapers, and media. However, 36% said they would be influenced by their doctor's recommendation. Pregnant participants were significantly more likely to wait until their doctor recommended it (17.6% of pregnant persons compared to 3.7% of non-pregnant p < 0.0001). Despite mistrust and other discouraging factors, many persons, under appropriate circumstances (e.g., reassurance about vaccine safety) may be motivated to take the vaccine. Even those who claimed that they wouldn't take the vaccine under any circumstance may be influenced by their health care providers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Belief Model , Health Personnel , Vaccination
2.
Acta Paediatr ; 112(7): 1398-1403, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2192369

ABSTRACT

AIM: The COVID-19 omicron variant surge highlighted the evolving impact of COVID-19. Febrile infants <60 days old are high risk for serious bacterial infections (SBI). This study evaluated the rate of SBI based on COVID-19 infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review at an urban, academic paediatric emergency department. The study enrolled infants 60 days old or less with documented fever. The primary outcome was SBI diagnosed by blood, urine, and/or cerebrospinal fluid cultures. We compared the rate of SBI between COVID-19 groups with an omicron variant and 29- to 60-day-old subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-three (233) infants meet the criteria. The incidence of SBI was 18.7% in the COVID-19 negative and 1.7% in the COVID-19-positive group which is statistically significant (p < 0.001). Omicron subgroup analysis did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.62) while COVID-19-positive infants 29-60 days old had a statistically significant lower rate of SBI (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The omicron variant surge provided an additional understanding of the impact of COVID-19 on these high-risk infants. These results can lead to decreased invasive testing and exposure to antibiotics as well as examine the utility of viral testing for risk stratification.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology
3.
Neurohospitalist ; 12(4): 597-606, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1868996

ABSTRACT

Background and Purpose: Skeletal muscle symptoms and elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels have been consistently reported as part of the COVID-19 disease process. Previous studies have yet to show a consistent relationship between CK levels and skeletal muscle symptoms, disease severity, and death from COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to determine whether elevated CK is associated with a COVID-19 course requiring intubation, intensive care, and/or causing death. Secondary objectives: To determine if there is a relationship between elevated CK and (1) skeletal muscle symptoms/signs (2) complications of COVID-19 and (3) other diagnostic laboratory values. Methods: This is a retrospective, single center cohort study. Data were collected from March 13, 2020, to May 13, 2020. This study included 289 hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and measured CK levels during admission. Results: Of 289 patients (mean age 68.5 [SD 13.8] years, 145 [50.2%] were men, 262 [90.7%] were African American) with COVID-19, 52 (18.0%) reported myalgia, 92 (31.8%) reported subjective weakness, and 132 (45.7%) had elevated CK levels (defined as greater than 220 U/L). Elevated CK was found to be associated with severity of disease, even when adjusting for inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (initial CK: OR 1.006 [95% CI: 1.002-1.011]; peak CK: OR 1.006 [95% CI: 1.002-1.01]; last CK: 1.009 [95% CI: 1.002-1.016]; q = .04). Creatine kinase was not found to be associated with skeletal muscle symptoms/signs or with other laboratory markers. Conclusions: Creatine kinase is of possible clinical significance and may be used as an additional data point in predicting the trajectory of the COVID-19 disease process.

4.
Popul Health Manag ; 25(2): 186-191, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1864947

ABSTRACT

In March 2020, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, New York City instituted a shelter-in-place order, dramatically affecting the area's social and economic landscape. Pediatric primary care practices universally screen for social determinants of health (SDOH) and mental health (MH) needs, providing an opportunity to assess changes in the population's needs during COVID-19. To assess changes in SDOH and MH needs of pediatric families before and during COVID-19, the authors conducted a prospective cohort study of patients seen in the hospital's pediatric primary care practices. Baseline data were collected during well visits from March 1, 2019 to March 1, 2020, and included the following outcome measures: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) score >0, PHQ9 scores ≥5, pediatric symptom checklist (PSC17) scores ≥15, and SDOH needs. Follow-up pandemic data were collected from June to August 2020. A total of 423 patients (215 [51%] female, 279 [66%] Hispanic, and 248 [59%] primary English speakers) were enrolled in the study. The following SDOH needs significantly increased during COVID-19: food (17%-32%; P < 0.001), legal (19%-30%; P = 0.003), public benefits (4%-13.8%; P < 0.001), and housing (17.2%-26%; P = 0.002). There was no significant change in MH screening results during COVID-19 compared with baseline: positive PHQ2 depression screen (27.9% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.39), positive PHQ9 depression screen (45.5% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.32), or positive PSC17 measuring emotional and behavioral concerns (4.9% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.13). During COVID-19, patients with food, housing, or legal needs had a significantly higher likelihood of having emotional or behavioral difficulties (P < 0.01). Further research is needed to evaluate outcomes in the following months.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pediatrics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , New York City/epidemiology , Pandemics , Primary Health Care , Prospective Studies , Social Determinants of Health
5.
Am J Perinatol ; 2021 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1585685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine temporal trends in the clinical presentation of patients diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who were universally screened for SARS-CoV-2 and tested positive. This multi-center study of admissions to labor and delivery units in New York City and Long Island included all SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women admitted to labor and delivery units between April 10th and June 4th 2020. Six Northwell Health hospitals and Maimonides Medical Center were included in the study. The main measures of the study included patient reports of COVID-19 symptoms: fever, cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The main outcome measure was the percentage of all infected women who reported any of the above symptoms. RESULTS: In total, 427 infected pregnant women were included in the study. There was a statistically significant decline in the percentage of patients presenting with any symptoms over the course of the study. In addition, disease severity, symptoms of fever, cough, and chest pain/shortness of breath also significantly declined over time, and no ICU admissions were noted after the third week of April. CONCLUSIONS: There was a temporal shift away from symptomatic presentation in pregnant women diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 over the course of the first months of the epidemic in New York. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the cause of this change in presentation among pregnant women, to determine whether this trend is also observed in other patient populations. KEY POINTS: · Retrospective cohort review of 427 SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women admitted to labor and delivery units.. · A significant decline in the percentage of patients presenting with symptoms over time was noted.. · Further studies are necessary to elucidate the cause of this change in presentation.. · Theories for the noted trend: viral evolution, decreased viral inoculums, and prolonged polymerase chain reaction positivity..

6.
Am J Perinatol ; 2021 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1514440

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare maternal outcomes of women with and without severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections who underwent cesarean births. STUDY DESIGN: This was a matched cohort study of pregnant women who had a cesarean birth between March 15, 2020, and May 20, 2020. Cases included women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. For every case, two patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 were matched by maternal age, gestational age, body mass index, primary or repeat cesarean birth, and whether the procedure was scheduled or unscheduled. We compared rates of adverse postcesarean complications (intraoperative bladder or bowel injury, estimated blood loss more than or equal to 1,000 mL, hemoglobin drop more than 3 g/dL, hematocrit drop more than 10%, need for blood transfusion, need for hysterectomy, maternal intensive care unit admission, postoperative fever, and development of surgical site infection), with the primary outcome being a composite of those outcomes. We also assessed duration of postoperative stay. Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare the primary outcome between both groups. RESULTS: Between March and May 2020, 202 women who subsequently underwent cesarean birth were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of those 202, 43 (21.3%) patients were positive. They were matched to 86 patients who tested negative. There was no significant difference in the rate of composite adverse surgical outcomes between the groups (SARS-CoV-2 infected 27.9%, SARS-CoV-2 uninfected 25.6%; p = 0.833). There was a higher rate of postoperative fevers (20.9 vs. 5.8%; p = 0.015), but that did not result in a longer length of stay (p = 0.302). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 who underwent a cesarean birth did not have an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes, other than fever, compared with pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2. KEY POINTS: · Women with SARS-CoV-2 had more postoperative fevers.. · Length of stay did not differ based on SARS-CoV-2 status.. · Composite postoperative outcome did not differ based on SARS-CoV-2 status..

7.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(10): 1176-1183, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1277859

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are complications which may be associated with barotrauma in mechanically ventilated patients. The current literature demonstrates unclear outcomes regarding barotrauma in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of barotrauma in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and its influence on survival. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed from March 18, 2020 to May 5, 2020, with follow-up through June 18, 2020, encompassing critically ill intubated patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia at an academic tertiary care hospital in Brooklyn, New York. Critically ill patients with pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, or both (n = 75) were compared to those without evidence of barotrauma (n = 206). Clinical characteristics and short-term patient outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Barotrauma occurred in 75/281 (26.7%) of included patients. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased 30-day mortality were elevated age (HR 1.015 [95% CI 1.004-1.027], P = 0.006), barotrauma (1.417 [1.040-1.931], P = 0.027), and renal dysfunction (1.602 [1.055-2.432], P = 0.027). Protective factors were administration of remdesivir (0.479 [0.321-0.714], P < 0.001) and receipt of steroids (0.488 [0.370-0.643], P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Barotrauma occurred at high rates in intubated critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and was found to be an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality.


Subject(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Barotrauma/complications , Barotrauma/epidemiology , Critical Illness , Humans , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
8.
J Community Health ; 46(5): 1029-1035, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1184692

ABSTRACT

While data have shown that Black populations are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, few studies have evaluated birth outcomes in these understudied populations. This study hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 infection would confer worse maternal and neonatal outcomes in a predominantly Black and underserved population in Brooklyn, New York City. In particular, SARS-CoV-2 is associated with higher rates of preterm birth, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, lower APGAR scores, and neonatal resuscitation. Demographic factors and comorbidities were compared between the SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative groups. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in hospitalized patients who gave birth at Kings County Hospital from April 10 through June 10, 2020. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the electronic medical record. Patients were categorized based on SARS-CoV-2 infection status and peripartum outcomes were analyzed. We used the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant. There were no differences in obstetric or neonatal outcomes between the SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative cohorts. Most SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were asymptomatic on admission. The rates of maternal comorbidities were similar in the SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative groups. In this predominantly Black population in Brooklyn, SARS-CoV-2 infection did not confer increased risk of adverse obstetric or neonatal outcomes, despite the prevalence of comorbidities. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes is complex and may differ on a community level. Determining how COVID-19 is associated with perinatal outcomes in this minoritized patient population will augment our understanding of health disparities in order to improve care.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Asthma/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , New York City/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Poverty Areas , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Resuscitation , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Blood Med ; 12: 157-164, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1181235

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated the utility of an automated chemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assay platform in quantifying the amount of binding antibodies present in donated convalescent plasma. METHODS: A total of 179 convalescent plasma units were analyzed for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies using the Beckman-Coulter chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) platform. The equipment-derived numerical values (S/Co ratio) were recorded. Aliquots from the same units were subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein. The relationship between ELISA titers and CLIA S/Co values was analyzed using linear regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Twenty-one samples (11.7%) had S/Co values of less than 1.0 and were deemed negative for antibodies and convalescent plasma had S/Co values between >1.0 and 5.0 (70/179, 39.1%). Fifteen units (8.4%) had negative ELISA titer. The majority of the units (95/179. 53.1%) had titers ≥1:1024. The sensitivities of ELISA to CLIA were comparable (90.5% vs 88.3%, respectively; p=0.18). There was positive linear correlation between CLIA S/Co values and ELISA IgG titer (Rho = 0.75; Spearman's rank = 0.82, p-value = <0.0001). The agreement between the two methods was fair, with a κ index of 0.2741. Using the ROC analysis, we identified a CLIA S/Co cutoff value of 8.2, which gives a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 82% in predicting a titer dilution of ≥1:1024. CONCLUSION: The utility of automated antibody detection systems can be extended from simply a screening method to a semi-quantitative and quantitative functional antibody analysis. CLIA S/Co values can be used to reliably estimate the ELISA antibody titer. Incorporation of chemiluminescent-based methods can provide rapid, cost-effective means of identifying anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in donated plasma for use in the treatment of COVID-19 infection.

10.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 145(6): 648-656, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1089149

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT.­: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to have effects outside of the respiratory system. Placental pathology in the setting of maternal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remains a topic of great interest because earlier studies have shown mixed results. OBJECTIVE.­: To ascertain whether maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with any specific placental histopathology, and to evaluate the virus's propensity for direct placental involvement. DESIGN.­: Placentas from 65 women with polymerase chain reaction-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent histologic evaluation using Amsterdam consensus group criteria and terminology. Another 85 placentas from women without SARS-CoV-2 constituted the negative control group. A total of 64 of the placentas from the SARS-CoV-2-positive group underwent immunohistochemical staining for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. RESULTS.­: Pathologic findings were divided into maternal vascular malperfusion, fetal vascular malperfusion, chronic inflammatory lesions, amniotic fluid infection sequence, increased perivillous fibrin, intervillous thrombi, increased subchorionic fibrin, meconium-laden macrophages (M-LMs) within fetal membranes, and chorangiosis. There was no statistically significant difference in prevalence of any specific placental histopathology between the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative groups. There was no immunohistochemical evidence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in any of the 64 placentas that underwent staining for viral nucleocapsid protein. CONCLUSIONS.­: Our study results and a literature review suggest that there is no characteristic histopathology in most placentas from women with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Likewise, direct placental involvement by SARS-CoV-2 is a rare event.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/pathology , Placenta/pathology , Placenta/virology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/pathology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
11.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(4): 105603, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1065395

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical, laboratory, temporal, radiographic, and outcome features of acute Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, consecutive case series of patients admitted with ICH to Maimonides Medical Center from March 1 through July 31, 2020, who had confirmed or highly suspected COVID-19. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and outcome data were analyzed. ICH rates among all strokes were compared to the same time period in 2019 in two-week time intervals. Correlation of systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to clinical outcomes were performed. RESULTS: Of 324 patients who presented with stroke, 65 (20%) were diagnosed with non-traumatic ICH: 8 had confirmed and 3 had highly suspected COVID-19. Nine (82%) had at least one associated risk factor for ICH. Three ICHs occurred during inpatient anticoagulation. More than half (6) suffered either deep or cerebellar hemorrhages; only 2 were lobar hemorrhages. Two of 8 patients with severe pneumonia survived. During the NYC COVID-19 peak period in April, ICH comprised the highest percentage of all strokes (40%), and then steadily decreased week-after-week (p = 0.02). SBPV and NLR were moderately and weakly positively correlated to discharge modified Rankin Scale, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 associated ICH is often associated with at least one known ICH risk factor and severe pneumonia. There was a suggestive relative surge in ICH among all stroke types during the first peak of the NYC pandemic. It is important to be vigilant of ICH as a possible and important manifestation of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Intracranial Hemorrhages/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Intracranial Hemorrhages/diagnostic imaging , Intracranial Hemorrhages/therapy , Male , New York/epidemiology , Prevalence , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
12.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e044526, 2021 01 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1060157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine if obesity and diabetes are risk factors for severe outcomes in COVID-19 and to compare patient outcomes in those two conditions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban tertiary care center in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: 302 patients admitted in an inpatient setting, ≥18 years old, with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 via nasal PCR swab were randomly selected. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on their body mass index and hemoglobin A1c. 150 patients were placed in the non-obese, non-diabetic cohort and 152 patients were placed in the corresponding cohort (obesity alone, obesity and diabetes, and diabetes alone). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were development of acute kidney injury, commencement of renal replacement therapy, aminotransferase elevation, troponin elevation, lactic acidosis, development of septic shock, use of vasopressors, presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and intubation. The secondary outcomes were length of stay in days and mortality. RESULTS: Patients with obesity and/or diabetes were more likely to develop ARDS (79 patients vs 57 patients, p<0.0001) and to be intubated (71 patients vs 45 patients, p=0.0031). Patients with obesity and/or diabetes were more likely to require vasopressors (60 patients vs 41 patients, p=0.0284) and to develop lactic acidosis (median 3.15 mmol/L, IQR 1.8 to 5.2 mmol/L, p=0.0432). When comparing patients with diabetes with and without obesity against patients with obesity alone, they were more likely to develop ARDS (87.5%, p=0.0305). Despite these findings, there was no difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalised with COVID-19, those with obesity and/or diabetes were more likely to suffer severe complications, but had negligible differences in mortality. This highlights the importance of close monitoring of patients with these conditions and additional areas of research needed to explain the mortality findings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Obesity , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , New York City/epidemiology , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/epidemiology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Random Allocation , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors
13.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology ; 224(2, Supplement):S472-S473, 2021.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1056197
15.
J Robot Surg ; 14(6): 913-915, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-617358

ABSTRACT

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is the gold standard for the surgical management of localized prostate cancer (PCa). Multi-institutional series have demonstrated complications and readmissions in less than 5% of patients and most are now discharged within 24 h of surgery. Recently, several high-volume surgeons demonstrated the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) after RALP. The main benefits include lower costs and reduced exposure to nosocomial infections and hospital errors. The leading arguments for criticism include potential suboptimal postoperative care and the risk of missing a catastrophic event. In recent years, important advances have further strengthened the argument for SDD including more structured perioperative care, integration of single-port robotic systems, and new challenges presented by the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Here, we provide further evidence demonstrating the safety of SDD in a multi-institutional cohort of patients and review the main arguments supporting the expanded use of this approach.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Laparoscopy , Patient Admission , Perioperative Care/methods , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Databases, Factual , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Patient Safety , Prostatectomy/methods , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL